Our team adopted
Google Hangouts (www.google.com/+/learnmore/hangouts/)
for team meeting to facilitate collaboration during these two months of team
work. The advantage of using Google
Hangouts is that it is capable of supporting up to nine persons simultaneous
video conferencing. Productivity tools
like Google Drive are also helping in teamwork sharing and collaborating. As such, our teammates who are geographically
separated can meet and work together by virtual means. With these technologies, we could arrange
meetings more easily.
Moreover, with
the help of Google Slide and Screen Share, we can share the latest version of
the presentation materials among teammates, and each team members could give
feedback real-time. Most importantly,
when the most updated version is always put online and being kept in a
centralized location, the chance of updating incorrect versions in
collaboration is slim.
Google Calendar
also plays an important role in collaboration.
Not only teammates can check the team’s schedule, but also individual schedule. Google Calendar has notification capability
which acts like alarm clock for notifying teammates on important deadlines and
milestones.
Team members are
being able to work with these tools with efficiency. They are also keeping up with schedule and
update information without confusion under minimal supervision and guidance. For example, when the document are being kept
in Google Doc, team members could contribute to the same document for updating
a specific part assigned to them, without having to worry about overwriting
each other’s updates. Also, we would
have been using email attachment when we have not used Google Drive, as such we
don’t have to waste effort on handling manual version keeping and merging of
multiple copies from different individual.
Brainstorming is
the major method of consolidating collective thinking during virtual
meeting. In order to ensure effective outcomes,
each team members must prepare before meeting the materials which were in their
expertise. Through proper division of labor, effective assignment based on
members’ expertise, and brainstorming, an interim decision was made.
Each interim
decision was then discussed before finalization. Different group of virtual team would discuss
the interim decisions and hopefully they could arrive with consensus on the
issues. After few round of negotiations
among different groups, a finalized decision would emerge.
The first
conflict was the disagreement on adopting team work technologies. This conflict
was resolved by sparing extra session on demonstrating and discussing the use
of these technologies and fortunately we have come up with consensus by
performing workshop on them.
The second
conflict was during the brainstorming process.
Brainstorming could help creating ideas, but the process would be easily
side-tracked. The conflict was resolved
by requiring members to support their ideas with facts when the brainstorming
was leading to chaos.
The
third conflict was the disagreement on final decision after meeting. This was
where we introduced iterative negotiation processes where interim decisions
were refined through iteration of discussion with different combination of
virtual team. This was a timely process
but we are grateful that this always led to common consensus in the end.
As mentioned
before, Google Hangouts, Google Drive, Google Doc and Google Side, etc.
facilitated team collaboration. However,
sometime these technologies did not work as expect, for example some team
members claimed that those services are sometime inaccessible when they were in
China, some even didn’t understand the operation of those technologies. As a result they would resort to use more
primitive and ineffective technologies like email, which would eventually
hamper our performance.
I committed to
the team with my knowledge in collaborating technologies, and my experience on
management which is also helping in resolving conflicts.
I have
successfully organized meeting and led the team to its full potent, and
resolved couple of conflicts arise.
My major concern
in sharing with the group was our cultural differences might lead to conflict
in believes which would eventually end up with unnecessary argument or
side-tracking on topics.
Regardless, I
have not shared with the group that I think we have taken too much time on
iterative negotiations during disagreement on decision. Sometime I think I would have been more
effective to resolve these disagreements when we have chance to meet in person,
because there would have been changed in attitude when people are met in
person.
Nevertheless, I
believe the group is working very well, given that the outcome of our work is
quite satisfactory. I think outcome is
all that matters.
In conclusion, I
believe our group is completing a high quality project because, first we have
successfully made use of technology to surmount our geographically barrier;
second we resolved conflicts with our pre-determined processes and eventually
come up with ideas that was a result of our fully committed efforts.